Kashmir In Crisis: What’s India Doing? | AJ+
Read Time:8 Second

Kashmir In Crisis: What’s India Doing? | AJ+

0 0



Kashmir has been under a strict lockdown ever since Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi stripped the state of its autonomy in August 2019. But repression in … .

source

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

45 thoughts on “Kashmir In Crisis: What’s India Doing? | AJ+

  1. Have you tried reporting from POK (Pakistan occupied kashmir)…have you ever reported what happened with kashmiri Hindus , what happened which forced hindus to leave their hometown in kashmir. And living as a refuges in other parts of the country.
    And yes we don't want to kill anyone…but if you are poor No one will support you this is what happened with india .

  2. "kAshMir is MUslim majOrity aRea" yes because the Kashmiri Hindus(pandits) were massacred. And you don't want world to know how Aljazeera and other Islamic media outlet helped enable it .
    Blood is ONLY on your hand, don't play victim.

  3. AJ+ at it again 🤡👌 Lies lies lies and then play victim. White washing terrorism and portraying defensive retaliation as attack on minorities. Do you know anything else. Stop Propoganda!

  4. As an Indian Hindu, I was this close to taking this documentary seriously till I realised they said Kashmiri Hindus left due to violence and ethnic cleansing, if any, is of the Kashmiri Muslims post article 370 letting non-Muslims settle in the state. I fully support the right of Kashmiris for self determination given the situation since last 70 years. But pls do not ignore the non-Muslim Kashmiris.

    At least have the decency to cover all aspects and keep aside your narrative for a change. The Kashmiri Pandit genocide and ethnic cleansing was not even mentioned or acknowledged. Mention of Buddhist/Sikhs/X'tian Kashmiris – none. Settling illegal Rohingya's in Jammu – not mentioned. Misuse of political power by the Kashmiri politicians – not mentioned. Impact of article 370 on other parts of the state like Ladakh/Jammu – ignored. Pakistani involvement – brushed aside stating they have denied it – how's that for a joke. How on earth can you guys get away with such biased coverage?

    FYI, I'm not a Modi fan so you stop frothing in your mouth. You don't need to be bhakt or a champagne sipping socialist lefty to call out biased coverage.

  5. Those were similarity
    Here are the dissimilarities.

    Indians haven't illegally settled in Kashmir unlike Israel

    The Kashmiri conflict results in huge number of death to both sides unlike Israel where it's the Palestinians who are largely killed.

    Kashmir's main issue is a secular Indian constitution while PLO in Palestine is a secular left leaning political party.

    In 1992 Kashmiri militancy pushed out all minority (32% at that time) out of Kashmir valley. Which gave political leverage to India to use armed forces.

    Unlike Israel, India is basically a United federation of different states not a Hindu version of Zionism.

    And using words like "accused" and "alleged" for pakistan's interference is just Straight out cherry picking sides. Pakistani politicians have openly admited to create, train and fund proxy wars in Kashmir.

  6. Those hindus who will be settled were beaten and forced to leave their homes in 1992. Kashmir is their home and India isn't trying to change the demographics of Kashmir.

  7. And what about Kashmiri pandits ? Mass exodus of kashmiri pandit's led to this situation . Before Kashmir was not that militarised but when Kashmiri pandits were killed then India militarized kashmir . You swiftly dodge the part where Kashmiri pandits were killed this is nothing but a biased video . India called Pakistan for talks and referendum in kashmir but Pakistan was not ready to leave their part of Kashmir so told they will negotiate on India part of kashmir but not the Pakistani part ,why? If they want referendum then that should be on both sides .

  8. Lets say for a moment that kashmir did not wanna come to india
    But when the ruler of kashmir want independent country why pak invade kashmir bcuz of that sole reason the ruler of kashmir associate himself with india

    Why are you protesting about the issue if it has been produced by you

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous post Indian constitution vs American constitution Full Comparison UNBIASED in Hindi 2021 | Constitution of India
Next post How India got its name I Hidden truth with evidence i கற்றதும் அறிந்ததும் I Annamalai Sakkaraisamy